This comment form is no longer interactive because the comment period is closed.

MRO Regional Reliability Standards Development Procedure

Description:

Start Date: 04/21/2021
End Date: 06/04/2021

Associated Ballots:

Ballot Name Project Standard Pool Open Pool Close Voting Start Voting End

Filter:

Hot Answers

Donna Wood, On Behalf of: Tri-State G and T Association, Inc., , Segments 1, 3, 5

- 0 - 0

AEP finds nothing objectionable regarding provisions for “open criteria” within the edits provided in the current draft, but we would like to offer a few general suggestions for consideration regarding MRO’s Regional Reliability Standards Process. We hope these suggestions might further promote the openness inherent in MRO’s current process.

While MRO’s ballot body may not currently be active, it would be helpful if the MRO website had a single webpage which listed the name of every individual officially registered for MRO’s ballot body and the segment they represent. This would allow industry to see at any given time exactly who is registered, as well as the entity and industry segment they each represent. Contact information need not (and probably should not) be provided.

While there is presumably no regional standards development activity currently underway within the MRO footprint, this will not always be the case. When that activity resumes again, many from industry will not have participated in MRO commenting and balloting for quite some time, while others will have never previously done so at all. It may be worth considering, before MRO regional standards are once again either revised or developed, for MRO to provide informal training or presentations on the overall commenting and balloting process.

Before MRO regional standards are once again revised or developed, we believe it would be beneficial for an outreach to be conducted regarding the MRO ballot body itself, not only reaching out to those who were in it previously, but also to industry in general to allow individuals to petition to join the RBB as new members. We believe it would be preferable to do so well in advance of actual efforts related to MRO regional standards development.

Thomas Foltz, On Behalf of: AEP, , Segments 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

LaTroy Brumfield, On Behalf of: American Transmission Company, LLC, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

Donna Wood, On Behalf of: Tri-State G and T Association, Inc., , Segments 1, 3, 5

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, On Behalf of: AEP, , Segments 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

LaTroy Brumfield, On Behalf of: American Transmission Company, LLC, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

Donna Wood, On Behalf of: Tri-State G and T Association, Inc., , Segments 1, 3, 5

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, On Behalf of: AEP, , Segments 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

LaTroy Brumfield, On Behalf of: American Transmission Company, LLC, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

Donna Wood, On Behalf of: Tri-State G and T Association, Inc., , Segments 1, 3, 5

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, On Behalf of: AEP, , Segments 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

LaTroy Brumfield, On Behalf of: American Transmission Company, LLC, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

Donna Wood, On Behalf of: Tri-State G and T Association, Inc., , Segments 1, 3, 5

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, On Behalf of: AEP, , Segments 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

LaTroy Brumfield, On Behalf of: American Transmission Company, LLC, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0