This comment form is no longer interactive because the comment period is closed.

Project 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registeation

Description:

Start Date: 10/29/2019
End Date: 12/12/2019

Associated Ballots:

Ballot Name Project Standard Pool Open Pool Close Voting Start Voting End
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration FAC-002-3 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration FAC-002-3 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration IRO-010-3 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration IRO-010-3 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration MOD-031-3 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration MOD-031-3 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration MOD-033-2 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration MOD-033-2 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration NUC-001-4 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration NUC-001-4 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration PRC-006-4 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration PRC-006-4 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration TOP-003-4 IN 1 ST 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration TOP-003-4 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019
2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration Implementation Plan IN 1 OT 2017-07 Standards Alignment with Registration Implementation Plan 10/29/2019 11/27/2019 12/03/2019 12/12/2019

Filter:

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

I am ok with removing references to retired functions. 

However, doing only this separately from normal five year review, "Technical Rationale for Reliability Standards", and “Standards Efficiency” Projects is time consuming and unnecessary and inefficient.

 

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

I am ok with removing references to retired functions. 

 

However, doing only this separately from the normal five year review, "Technical Rationale for Reliability Standards", and “Standards Efficiency” Projects is time consuming and unnecessary and inefficient.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

WECC agrees with the proposed changes but questions whether the Version History Table, last entry, should indicate Version 3 rather than Version 2. All the other Standards associated with this project identify the newly proposed version as the last entry rather than the current version.

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the removal of Load Serving Entities from FAC-002-2.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE noticed the following:

  • In the VSL language, the word “Entity” needs to be removed in the Moderate, High, and Severe language for R3.

  • On Page 8, in the Version History table, it should list version “3” in last box.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Ameren agrees with EEI and supports the removal of Load Serving Entities from this standard.

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the removal of Load Serving Entities from this standard.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NO. See Response to Question 1.

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

See Response to Question 1.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the changes proposed to IRO-10-2.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE noticed the word “standard” in the header on pages 7 and 8.  The word “standard” does not appear in the header on the other pages.

The phrase “Corresponding changes have been made to proposed TOP-003-3.” This should refer to TOP-003-4.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Ameren agrees with EEI and supports the changes proposed to IRO-10-2.

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the changes proposed to IRO-10-2.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NO. See Response to Question 1.

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

See Response to Question 1.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

N/A

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the changes proposed to MOD-031-2 and MOD-033-1.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE recommends defining “Applicable Entity” since the term is capitalized and used in Requirement R2, Measure M2, Requirement R4, and Measure M4.  The SDT could add the following language in section 4: “For the purpose of the requirements contained herein, the following list of functional entities will be collectively referred to as Applicable Entities. For requirements in this standard where a specific functional entity or subset of functional entities are the applicable entity or entities, the functional entity or entities are specified explicitly.”  Alternatively, Texas RE recommends using the term Responsible Entity as that is the term used and defined in the CIP Reliability Standards.

 

Texas RE noticed the Background section was removed from MOD-033, but not in MOD-031. 

 

Texas RE recommends adding header information regarding the Standard in the Application Guidelines for both MOD-031 and MOD-033 such as was done in IRO-010 in order to be consistent.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Ameren agrees with EEI and supports the changes proposed to MOD-031-2 and MOD-033-1.

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the changes proposed to MOD-031-2 and MOD-033-1.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NO. See Response to Question 1.

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

See Response to Question 1.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

N/A

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the changes proposed to NUC-001-3.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE noticed the Effective Date section is removed, but it exists in the previous standards reviewed (FAC-002-3, IRO-010-3, MOD-031-3, and MOD-33-2).  Texas RE recommends keeping this section to be consistent.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Ameren agrees with EEI and supports the changes proposed to NUC-001-4.

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the changes proposed to NUC-001-4.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

N/A

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NO. See Response to Question 1.

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

See Response to Question 1.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

The language should mimic the ROP such as: " Distribution Provider that operates a required UFLS" and a footnote should be used to refer the reader to the ROP.  Anything less than this tends to cause confusion or result in more questions than it resolves.

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Reclamation recommends revising the applicability section to eliminate redundancy between 4.2 and 4.3. Since Transmission Owners are identified as a subset of 4.2, it is not necessary to list them as a separate applicable entity in 4.3. Reclamation recommends the SDT revise 4.2 as follows:

From: 4.2 UFLS entities shall mean all entities that are responsible for the ownership, operation, or control of UFLS equipment as required by the UFLS program established by the Planning Coordinators. Such entities may include one or more of the following:

4.2.1 Transmission Owners

4.2.2 Distribution Providers

        

To:      4.2 UFLS entities – all entities that are responsible for the ownership, operation, or control of UFLS equipment or Elements as required by the UFLS program established by the Planning Coordinator. Such entities may include:

                             4.2.1 Transmission Owners

                             4.2.2 Distribution Providers

                             4.2.3 UFLS-Only Distribution Providers

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

N/A

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the changes proposed to PRC-006-3.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE noticed the following:

  • The attachment still uses PRC-006-3.  Should that be updated to PRC-006-4?  Thus, Requirements R3 and R4 would need to be updated to the new attachment name.  The Regional Variance for Quebec’s attachment also references PRC-006-3.

  • The Implementation Plan states that “PRC-006 was updated to replace Distribution Providers (DP) with the more-limited UFLS-only DP to the Applicability Section.” PRC-006-4 appears to add UFLS-Only DPs and not replace DPs.  Texas RE suggests revising the implementation plan to match the standard.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

"Attachment 1" (pg 37) and "Attachment 1A" (pg 39) do not have the titles changed to PRC-006-4.  Reference to those two attachments show up on pages 2, 3, 4, 21, 22, 25, 26 & 27. We believe they would also need to be updated.

Also, on page 1 under Introduction > Applicability, we believe a bullet entitled "4.2.3  UFLS-Only Distribution Providers1" should be added underneath "4.2.2  Distribution Providers."

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the changes proposed to PRC-006-4.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

Please consider removing the footnote regarding NERC Rules of Procedure, Appendix 5 and link to the NERC website. The footnote appears to be unnecessary.

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

OPG concurs with the RSC comment.

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NO. See Response to Question 1.

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

See Response to Question 1.

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Exelon supports the changes proposed to TOP-003-3.

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE does not have any comments on the revisions to TOP-00-3.  Texas RE did notice, however, that the Guidelines and Technical Basis references the incorrect version of PRC-001.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Ameren agrees with EEI and supports the changes proposed to TOP-003-3.

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

EEI supports the changes proposed to TOP-003-3.

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar Energy and Kansas City Power & Light support Edison Electric Institute’s response.

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0

Hot Answers

faranak sarbaz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 1, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Jamie Johnson, California ISO, 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Other Answers

DTE Energy - DTE Electric, Segment(s) 5, 4, 3, 2/27/2017

- 0 - 0

Leonard Kula, Independent Electricity System Operator, 2, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

NONE

Marty Hostler, Northern California Power Agency, 5, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Dennis Sismaet, Northern California Power Agency, 6, 11/5/2019

- 0 - 0

Kevin Conway, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, 1, 11/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Glen Farmer, Avista - Avista Corporation, 5, 11/18/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Aaron Cavanaugh, On Behalf of: Bonneville Power Administration, WECC, Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Laura Nelson, IDACORP - Idaho Power Company, 1, 11/25/2019

- 0 - 0

Thomas Foltz, AEP, 5, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

IRO-010-2 is also being reviewed as part of the “Technical Rationale for Reliability Standards” project (proposing to remove the Guidelines and Technical Basis section, but leaving the version number as IRO-010-2).

Dennis Chastain, On Behalf of: Tennessee Valley Authority - SERC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

LaTroy Brumfield, American Transmission Company, LLC, 1, 12/3/2019

- 0 - 0

John Tolo, 12/4/2019

- 0 - 0

None

Richard Jackson, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1, 12/6/2019

- 0 - 0

Carl Pineault, Hydro-Qu?bec Production, 5, 12/9/2019

- 0 - 0

None.

Duke Energy, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 4/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Steven Rueckert, On Behalf of: Western Electricity Coordinating Council, , Segments 10

- 0 - 0

Daniel Gacek, Exelon, 1, 12/11/2019

- 0 - 0

Stacy Lee, On Behalf of: City of College Station, , Segments 1

- 0 - 0

Texas RE noticed Section A 5 Effective Date is removed, but it remains in other standards.  In general Texas RE recommends reviewing the standards to ensure this section is consistent.  Texas RE noticed things such as some have 5.1 See Implementation Plan while others just say “See Implementation Plan” with no 5.1.

 

Texas RE suggests there is an opportunity to streamline this standard.  The Applicability section lists both Generators Owners and more specific Generator Owners in section 4.1.6.1.  It is likely that all Generators Owners will have these agreements so 4.1.6.1 could be removed.  Thus, Requirement R5 could be removed since Requirement R2 applies to all Generator Owners.

Rachel Coyne, Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., 10, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

None

David Jendras, Ameren - Ameren Services, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Mark Gray, On Behalf of: Edison Electric Institute, NA - Not Applicable, Segments NA - Not Applicable

- 0 - 0

Westar-KCPL, Segment(s) 1, 3, 5, 6, 12/18/2018

- 0 - 0

Please consider using the current NERC format for the revised standards. Please consider revising sections of the standards using current NERC wording. Example: Compliance section of the standards.

RSC, Segment(s) 10, 2, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 0, 6, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Trey Melcher, On Behalf of: Trey Melcher, , Segments 1, 5

- 0 - 0

Laurie Hammack, Seattle City Light, 3, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

OPG concurs with the RSC comment.

Constantin Chitescu, Ontario Power Generation Inc., 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Teresa Cantwell, Lower Colorado River Authority, 5, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Maryanne Darling-Reich, On Behalf of: Black Hills Corporation - MRO, WECC - Segments 1, 3, 5, 6

- 0 - 0

Bobbi Welch, Midcontinent ISO, Inc., 2, 12/12/2019

- 0 - 0

Southern Company, Segment(s) 1, 5, 6, 3, 7/26/2019

- 0 - 0